Your Partner for Certification in Russia, EAEU and International Markets
◎ EN | 中文✉ info@eacsert.com
EACSERTCertification & Compliance

EAC / EAEU Market Access

EAC certification for export to the EAEU

EAC Conformity for Welding Power Sources

Record input voltage, output characteristics, duty cycle and intended use; distinguish a separately supplied source from a complete welding-machine assembly. Assess the supplied electrical configuration, including input and output circuits, cooling, accessories and intended environment. For integration into machinery, define which hazards and conformity obligations belong to the complete assembly and which belong to the independently supplied source.

Welding Power Sources
✓Free initial assessment
✓English / 中文 support
✓Product-specific certification route

Quick compliance overview

Product category
Machinery & Equipment
HS / TN VED
8515
Assessment status
Electrical-item scope and product lists determine the form

What is usually required for this product?

Prepare electrical diagrams, model ratings and variants, insulation and protective measures, cooling and duty-cycle data, operating instructions, identification and applicable electrical-safety and EMC test evidence. Record input voltage, output characteristics, duty cycle and intended use; distinguish a separately supplied source from a complete welding-machine assembly.

Which conformity route applies?

The assessment identifies the machine type and hazards first, then checks the relevant list position, safety evidence and conformity route. For a separately supplied welding power source, first assess TR CU 004/2011 voltage limits and exclusions and TR CU 020/2011 EMC scope. Select declaration or certification from the applicable product lists and intended use. A standalone source must not automatically inherit the TR CU 010/2011 route of a complete welding machine.

Applicable technical regulations

Assess the supplied electrical configuration, including input and output circuits, cooling, accessories and intended environment. For integration into machinery, define which hazards and conformity obligations belong to the complete assembly and which belong to the independently supplied source.

Verified conformity information

Decision No. 36 of 13 March 2026 mainly took effect on 1 September 2026; its replacement of Annex 3 takes effect on 1 April 2028. Use the presently applicable product list and check country-specific implementation and existing-document transition provisions for the project.

Cost and timeframe

Final cost and duration depend on the applicable regulation, conformity scheme, testing scope, technical documentation, sample requirements and project configuration.

  • •Machine type and hazard profile
  • •Number of models and configurations
  • •Safety-function and testing scope
  • •Quality of risk assessment and technical documentation

Documents usually requested

For an initial assessment, manufacturers should normally be ready to provide:

  • Machine layout and principal drawings
  • Safety/risk assessment
  • Operating manual and maintenance instructions
  • Drive, control and safety-system description
  • Product datasheet and complete model list
  • Manufacturer and production-site details
  • Proposed HS / TN VED classification (8515)

EACSERT project support

More than a document-issuance service

We can manage the certification cycle from preparation for testing through final issuance, including development or adaptation of most of the technical documentation required for conformity assessment.

10,000+
certification projects delivered across the team's experience
200+
specialists in the wider expert network
Technical documentation
We can develop or adapt most documents needed for the conformity project.
Large CO₂ production line certification project

Related EACSERT experience

Large CO₂ production line certification project

A multi-stage industrial certification project lasting about two years and covering a large list of equipment within a CO₂ production line.

What the project required

A large equipment scope required coordinated conformity assessment, technical documentation and work across multiple certification tasks rather than a single standard document.

See case studies →

Typical EAC conformity assessment process

The assessment identifies the machine type and hazards first, then checks the relevant list position, safety evidence and conformity route.

  1. 01

    Identify the product and intended use

  2. 02

    Check HS / TN VED and applicable EAEU regulations

  3. 03

    Determine the required conformity route

  4. 04

    Prepare technical and commercial documentation

  5. 05

    Arrange samples, testing or production assessment where required

  6. 06

    Issue/register the conformity document and confirm EAC marking

HS / TN VED code pages

Frequently asked questions

Why does the exact machine function matter?

Similar HS headings can contain machinery with different legal routes; function and listed product description must match.

Is a risk assessment normally important?

Yes. For machinery it is a core document for identifying hazards and demonstrating how safety measures are implemented.

Which EAC regulation applies to Welding Power Sources?

For a separately supplied welding power source, first assess TR CU 004/2011 voltage limits and exclusions and TR CU 020/2011 EMC scope. Select declaration or certification from the applicable product lists and intended use. A standalone source must not automatically inherit the TR CU 010/2011 route of a complete welding machine.

Does the HS / TN VED code alone determine the route?

No. Customs classification is an important input, but the technical product description and the wording of the regulatory lists must be checked together.

Related products

Need an exact route for this product?

Send the product description, datasheet/manual and proposed HS / TN VED code. We will review the likely EAEU requirements and identify what is still needed for an exact quotation.

Get a free assessment

Important: HS / TN VED codes and product names alone do not always determine the legal conformity route. Exact classification must consider product characteristics, intended use and current regulatory lists.